Tension in the workplace

In my lifelong learning journey, education—whether acquired through formal or non-formal settings—has served as a means of self-fulfillment. Learning has consistently been motivated by a desire for personal growth, curiosity, and the development of knowledge and skills that enable me to contribute more effectively in both my professional and personal life. However, this perspective exists in tension with much of the learning that occurs in the workplace and my role as a workplace educator.

Organizational learning is driven by business priorities, regulatory requirements, and measurable performance outcomes rather than the learner's interests. As a result, workplace education often reflects a behaviourist orientation, emphasizing competency acquisition, standardization, and accountability, whereas my personal approach aligns more closely with the humanistic philosophy described by Elias and Merriam (2005), which values self-direction, autonomy, and personal growth. Reconciling these perspectives has become an important aspect of my philosophy as an educator. I recognize the necessity of achieving organizational objectives while also striving to create learning experiences that develop learner autonomy, reflection, and professional development. By balancing business objectives with opportunities for meaningful engagement, I believe workplace learning can support both organizational performance and individual development.